From Crust Corporate Knowledge Centre
Revision as of 06:15, 9 June 2022 by BuckWfp5593045 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "donwload site<br>When compared to following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially regarding videos, the next cloud should be downloaded as...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

donwload site
When compared to following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially regarding videos, the next cloud should be downloaded as a whole, while streaming. Just to stream! I have to install another app again. Cloud alone is not enough to stream.

Faster compared to the next cloud. About 20%.

When you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks less than another cloud (but breaking itself has already been a problem).

Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it's possible to write. However, the thing is that the document format is a bizarre format, such as .ndoc, which makes it extremely incompatible.

File sharing through the URL (but this is as far as another cloud is concerned).


It has a smaller capacity compared to the next cloud.

Compared to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.

Compared to the next cloud, it is extremely disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming is possible only for several selected sound sources. Another cloud only needs to be in a folder.

You need to share a URL so you can't share music files or videos.

According to the report, there is a saying that N drive appears like a local drive when installed, but only it comes out like a local drive, which is no not the same as the folder synchronization setting. It's a whole lot worse for computers in the first place when external programs play tricks in it. It's much better to just clean up the synchronization folder.***

It is extremely specialized in playing music. In particular, it's the only cloud that may play sound sources within an environment similar to MP3 players we are familiar with. Although each song has some buffering, it appears to play up to 192kpbs continuously, assuming that communication is in good condition in a 3G environment. Of course, in reality, it's often cut off at that point)

It includes a large capacity. This can be a significant advantage when considering domestic cloud services all together, which have low quality of media access in cloud services.

You can substitute the end drive above. In particular, if a picture is contained in a document, it really is rarely opened properly.

Streaming songs often cuts off (however, not often) due to communication problems with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. I feel like it's about once every two hours. And if you pay attention to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you are in a place where the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets cut off more often. And when it's in that state, you must find the path of the folder where in fact the song was playing and play it again.

The only way to share is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are available for file viewing. Except for those points, there is nothing to say even if it really is almost a webhard level.

Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)

Google Drive

It exerts tremendous power on paper documents. In particular, even lacking any office program, Google Drive can cover it somewhat. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, almost any simple document is OK.

It is advantageous to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By establishing only offline views, the files you work on can continue to be reflected in the cloud in real time. It is a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.

It is easy to connect with other Google services such as for example Gmail.

If you don't upload documents right to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capability of the file does not account for cloud storage (what can you mean, if you just utilize the web app, the capability of the Google drive is infinite).

Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. It is possible to flip through photos and videos can be played immediately. However, the loading time seems to take a little longer than the dropbox. I feel it), nonetheless it doesn't bother me.

There are probably the most apps that can be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the web environment without installing programs using the pc. It's a bit of a problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it is the best in the desktop environment.

Upload a little pdf file and change it out to Google Docs format. It could then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.

There is absolutely no bandwidth restriction in name. There is a testimony that it's a block after a large amount of writing, but it's not stipulated by company policy.

If you use Google Docs web app, it is possible to save documents indefinitely, but in the event that you save them indefinitely, it is the same as once you lose your Internet connection, you're going to sink and work with MS word, right?)

Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files using a variety of programs, nonetheless it is still crude in comparison to office programs applied to computers.Is it obvious?)


It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Could be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services require a specific amount of buffering time for every photo). However, in the event that you wait a bit for the dropbox, the photos in a single folder are loaded entirely. While looking at Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling is possible without the blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, it is possible to freely specify until the start of playback. It's the best in the world with regards to media reading.

There are various means of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the business level, etc.

The speed is relatively good. It's a lot faster than the Box and doesn't work with Google Drive.

The file capacity limit which can be uploaded from the free account is the largest. 300MB.

The bandwidth of the free account is larger than that of the Box. It really is updated by 20GB each day. It's practically infinite unless you're going to share large files.

The starting capacity is the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.

Price compared to capacity may be the most expensive cloud service. Dirty bastards...

There is a saying that changes in documents cannot be reflected in real time when working on documents.

Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.

The dropbox itself can't be documented.

There are the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. If you need to work on a document, you can choose the interface you need through the app drive and focus on it leisurely.

Regarding document files, simple document inquiry is really a convenient axis because previews are provided. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if you can find multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can even be flipped over the file or file, as is seen in the photo file.

File sharing support is fairly good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a website to share data conveniently with little usage of the web page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB per month, which is quite small.

Slow. Not paid people.

Media access is very disadvantageous. It's a whole lot worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's easier to just do it on some type of computer than listen to it for a test.

The uploadable file capacity limit may be the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.

In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.

Unless you install Boxeditor, the documentation will be written with an extension that may only be written on Box (it works, so it is much better than Dropbox, but it's significantly less than Google Drive).

It was recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is now quite convenient. Especially photo files. But the pace is still a bit slow.***


The writing function is very powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's may be the most similar to the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there's also the most supported handwriting, even though it is four-legged.

The basic capacity is rather good. 7GB. Well, it isn't that strong a difference.

It is no exaggeration to say that the interface of mobile apps is the most backward cloud service ever.

Here is my website 드라마 다시보기